021-7787770

诚信为本,市场在变,诚信永远不变...
服务热线:021-7787770
新闻中心分类
裁判专家:罗德里戈踢对方脚后跟,应该被罚下(裁判专家称罗德里戈踢到对手脚后跟,理应被罚下)发布日期:2026-01-01

Clarifying red card criteria

down

I want to provide a general breakdown of what could lead to a red card during a match. Although I can't give definitive claims, I'll include options for quick reference, like a checklist of criteria.

of

First, I should clarify the specifics of which match we're discussing. I'll explain the common offense types and various considerations, such as the point of contact and intensity of the foul.

prefe

I can touch on the sanctions involved, the VAR protocol, and mention precedents, but I'll keep it concise and even reply in Chinese!I want to provide clear options for the user in a polite and concise manner. I can share a clip or offer to break it down frame-by-frame if that’s what they prefer. Alternatively, I could give them a template to help structure an argument about the content. I’ll make sure to avoid heavy formatting so it’s easy to follow. Let's move forward with these next steps!

but

看起来你在说一条裁判解读:罗德里戈踢对手脚后跟,按规则应直接红牌。给你一个简洁判罚依据,便于理解或讨论:

  • 规则依据:踢或试图踢对手是直接任意球犯规;若动作具有过度使用力量/危及对手安全=严重犯规(比赛中争抢球)或暴力行为(与比赛无关/报复)→ 直接红牌。
  • 关键考量:接触点(脚后跟/跟腱很脆弱)、力度和速度、是否从身后、是否无球或报复、是否有踩踏/垫脚动作、是否可控、是否对对手造成危险。
  • 典型红牌特征:从身后踢向跟腱、无球情境或死球后报复、明显不争球/出脚冲人、力度大或有蓄意性。
  • VAR介入:若场上只给了黄牌,VAR可因“疑似漏判直接红牌”建议复核;若确认为严重犯规/暴力行为,应改判红牌。
  • 纪律与重启:判罚地点在犯规处;禁区内则点球+红牌;若是暴力行为且在场内,重启多为任意球/点球(看犯规位置)。

要不要我基于具体比赛片段按这些维度帮你逐条判?如果你给我比赛时间点或视频链接,我可以更精确地评估并给出一句话判词。